ADATA SSD 240GB 2.5 SATA SU630 - ASU630SS-240GQ-R, Internal SSD Storage

It was very easy to use, just had to plug it in to an empty storage slot and it worked as soon as it got power

This is one of the fastest hard you can buy at this price.

Just installed in a 10 year old HP desktop that was starting to get laggy and boggy. I would have to double click on just about everything to get it to do anything and it was slow to load everything. The Adata is installed as my boot drive and only holds the Windows 10 OS. I retained my old hard drive for storage. I noticed an instant improvement, PC works like new again. Cant believe such a cheap upgrade made such a difference. I thought it might decrease my boot time which it did but I wasnt expecting a speed improvement everywhere. No more double clicking while surfing the web! Bare bones drive so youll have to provide your own cable and mounting hardware and its probably not the fastest or most durable drive but for the money you cant beat the value.

SSD is working good. Good value for the money.

Pros: reasonably inexpensive and a good value. Cons: Not as fast as others I purchased this drive to replace an ailing mechanical hard drive on a older system. It is easy to install but it came with no screws or mounting hardware. You really cannot expect that for what you are paying. The install went rather smoothly and all the software loaded up fine. I was expecting a much faster response from an SSD but as this is an economy drive you realistically can’t expect that for the price. This is a drive only packaging and it is no frills. As I said earlier I expected it to be a little faster than it was but it is still much faster than a mechanical hard drive.

After 1 year temperatures spiked to 125 degrees and performance was down to 2 MB/s transfer Had to order Samsung 860 EVO as replacement - should not have failed that quickly

This is only the second SSD Ive ever owned, so maybe theres nothing wrong with it. The first one I bought (an Adata 120GB) has always run rather cool. However, this one tends to show high spikes in temperature (up to 128F) when its working hard. Ive removed the cover from the PC and blow air into the case to keep it cool. My theory: more chips producing heat within a confined space means the heat accumulates quickly and dissipates slowly.

For the low price I paid for this drive the speeds are great for basic laptop or desktop use, obviously much better then using a traditional hard drive. Even the smallest size of this drive is very fast. The endurance is lower then other drives you can buy but shouldnt be a problem for normal laptop or desktop use just to browse the web / edit documents and other basic tasks for a couple years till you are going to replace the computer in question anyways. This is one of the first QLC drives on the market. QLC stores 4 bits per cell versus previous TLC (3 bits per cell) , and MLC (2 bits per cell). Because of the difficulty from storing more bits per cell the amount of times it can reuse / rewrite over each area is decreased vs TLC / MLC, but modern solid state drives do a good job of leveling the wear across the whole drive so this shouldnt be an issue for normal use inside a laptop or a desktop for a couple of years, but this drive should not be used in a server nor in any situation where the whole drive gets frequently erased or rewritten. There is a good short news article on anandtech about this specific drive that mentioned that it uses NAND from Intel which should be very high quality because Intel is already using their QLC NAND in drives it is selling to large enterprise customers. The drive uses a Maxio controller with pseudo-SLC caching which seemed to work well as the drive met its quoted write specs. I purchased the 240gb drive which is the smallest size because i am only using this in a work laptop. Even though the 240gb version is the smallest size it is still very fast and as fast as the larger sizes. The drive did not warm up at all when running crystal diskmark for a few minutes. As you can see from the attached picture of the cystal diskmark results it read at 560MB/s and wrote at 478MB/s which is slightly faster read then in the specs, and almost as fast as sata3-600MB/s allows. I ran crystal diskmark an hour after installing windows 10, so the drive may have had time to fully refresh the cache.

Made a big difference in PC performance vs Hard Drive.

Very reasonably priced. Used to upgrade an old PC. Fresh install of Windows 10 Pro and it goes from post to password in about 30 seconds.