

Durvet 698916 Non-Spermicidal Sterile Lubricating Jelly, 5 oz
-
JUDY Mervar
> 24 hourUsed it for many years and with good resulst
-
Barbiehan
> 24 hourI have to catheterize my dog - hes disabled - and I use this for lubrication. It works well but I do wish the opening in the tube was larger so that when I got to the almost end of it - I could transfer that to another tube. I know this would probably ruin the sterile part of it but it seems like I waste at least 15% of each tube!
-
Taylor Brosious
> 24 hourUsed this when I was a Veterinary Technician. Doing some pet services on the side and this was my go to.
-
Jinny86
> 24 hourSmells weird and isn’t the best lubricant.
-
Elena Xavi
> 24 hourI mean, not sure what to write about the review other than we use it when doing AI and it works perfectly.
-
Hanna
> 24 hourI order it an within a couple days it is here! Haven’t had any animals have an reaction to this. Great product!
-
Barbiehan
> 24 hourDue to a back injury, I have to catheterize my dog (yes, really) 3 times a day - and your lubricant works perfectly.
-
Sara W.
> 24 hourI’m a veterinary technician and use this at work and home to express my dogs anal glands.
-
SpookyChick
> 24 hourOn the plus side, this is a high quality lube for a more than reasonable price. I object to this quote from the product description: lubricating females before breeding because it is sexist and narrow-minded. Not all sex is for procreation, even if my Lord suggests it should be. Im human and I do have desires. Who among us doesnt? (Please, no more emails from monks and nuns - arent you holier than thou types supposed to shun modern technology anyway?) I do not intend to be bred and I think you would find more females inclined to agree with my point of view. The whole feminist movement is alive, but not so well - and we women need to do something about it. But back to this cheap but excellent lube - they need to come up with a more marketable name.
-
kim
> 24 hourSafe and comfortable catheter insertion.