













Silicon Power 1TB - NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen3x4 2280 SSD (SP001TBP34A60M28)
-
Matthew
> 24 hourThis was the first NVMe drive I ever had running at gen 3 speeds which required a heatsink. I am cautiously optimistic because I have found SP SATA SSDs to be quite reliable. But this is a completely different product that runs too hot out of the box. So, I really wont know for a couple of years.
-
Jugdese Computer Solutions
> 24 hourA cut above the, fast and affordable
-
Nicole jones
> 24 hourWorks great. No problems at all.
-
Esteban Fabozzi
> 24 hourI started getting these drives because they are cheaper than the name brands while still delivering the same quality.
-
BEarl
> 24 hourBought to upgrade an older Lenovo Laptop from an HDD and it worked perfectly. The Lenovo S145-15IWL has a PCIE 3x4 M.2 slot contrary to some on- line sources that say is a SATA M.2 shot. Crystal Disk Mark showed that the read and write sites are close to the stated specs. Cant speak to longevity yet have only had it installed for a couple days.
-
Yvonne Labadie DVM
> 24 hourGreat value for money. Perhpas wait for any ongoing sale to get further bang for your buck!
-
Luis G Ospina
> 24 hourHasta este momento disfrutando responde correctamente velocidades super rápidas e copia de documentos en general para todo. Información rápida y asequible.
-
Jish
> 24 hourMUCH faster than anticipated at around 3ish GB down, 2ish GB up. Generic PCIE 3.0 x4 adapter in a PCIE 3.0 slot; Asus Maximus VI hero/ z87 chipset. Works great as main boot drive. Actual test images attached
-
WEIRD J
> 24 hourWorks up to expectations so far. Only been a couple weeks but no issues yet.. Aint technology grand?
-
Jonathan
> 24 hourThe 512GB A60 drive surprised me considering the cost. Using CrystalDiskMark, I got the following scores: SEQ1M Q8T1 - 2417 MB/s read, 1184 MB/s write SEQ1M Q1T1 - 1986 MB/s read, 1183 MB/s write RND4K Q32T1 - 297 MB/s read, 358 MB/s write RND4K Q1T1 - 48 MB/s read, 184 MB/s write This was achieved without using a heatsink on the M.2, with 5 passes of a 1GB file in CrystalDiskMark. The drive performs significantly better at sequential reads than seq. writes, while also performing better at random writes compared to reads. As long as the device stands the test of time, it is an excellent bargain purchase, exceeding its advertised read speed (albeit falling a bit short of its advertised write speeds). I will update this review if the drive fails prematurely.