Crucial MX500 1TB 3D NAND SATA 2.5 Inch Internal SSD, up to 560MB/s - CT1000MX500SSD1

Correspond aux attentes, pas plus difficile à installer que nimporte quel SSD, et je nai jamais eu de problèmes avec mes autres SSD de la même marque.

Straight forward, is to copy old drive. Order the cable if you are going to transfer an old drive to this drive.

Velocissimo, performante

Been using them for years. Good value with excellent tech support.

Its an SSD. The specs are out there if you want them.

Havent had this long, but it seems to be functioning great. Came with a nice users manual which I tossed out, cuz Im a man. Physically installing was easy and my PC had no issues accepting it. I can not speak for its booting abilities, as its installed as a storage drive, but theres no lag when opening or executing files. Im happy with the purchase. From what Ive read, Crucial makes good products at a lower price compared to many other brands. Could it be, the others use better Ones and Zeros? IDK... I do know, Im about to purchase some RAM next and Crucials price looks pretty darn good. I would suggest this to a friend, but theyre all out riding their motorcycles. While Im always busy fixing the familys computers. JK... I dont have any friends, but if I did... I would suggest it to them, that they should buy this SSD. 5.5 STARS BABY!

I needed another internal drive as my orchestral sample libraries were growing. This 2TB drive was perfect and didnt break the bank. It was a snap to install and is running smoothly. Only weird thing was that my BIOS saw the drive, and my disk manager in Windows saw the drive, but windows did not - so, a tweak in the Disk Manager and all was good.

Very good product!

It’s known for its stability and it’s proved it. My son is using it for his gaming computer and he doesn’t complain about anything about it. Good product.

I think most people should save a few dollars and get this over the Samsung 860 EVO. Sure, the Samsung has somewhat better specs, but nothing you will ever see in real-world usage. Performance is almost identical and while the Samsung has a better durability rating of 300 TBW (terra-bytes written) compared to 180 TBW for the Crucial, thats like 30 years of real-world use compared to 50 years. Only heavy professional workloads will put durability to the test.